Capital gains on unlisted financial assets: valuation as of 31 December 2025: Lessons from the preparatory works
Personal Income Tax and Legal Entities Income Tax
The Act
of 6 April 2026 introducing a tax on capital gains on financial assets was
published in the Belgian Official Gazette on 21 April 2026. It sets out four
methods for determining the historical value of unlisted financial assets as of
31 December 2025 (Article 102, §4, 2°, of the Belgian Income Tax Code 1992,
"ITC 92"). This newsletter examines the clarifications provided by
the preparatory works on the practical application of these four methods (DOC
for a printable/pdf version: click here
To Do: For valuations as at 31
December 2025, taxpayers holding unlisted financial assets will
need to decide quickly whether to engage a registered auditor (or certified
accountant) to obtain a report by 31 December 2027. Failing to
obtain a report within the allotted time, they will in many cases only be able
to rely on the EBITDA method alone, with the imperfections inherent
to that valuation method.
IN SUMMARY: THE FOUR METHODS AT A GLANCE
For unlisted financial assets, the value as of 31 December 2025 may, at the taxpayer's choice, be established under one or more of the following four methods:
Method 1 – Value derived from a transfer between independent parties in 2025
Method 2 – Value resulting from a contractual valuation formula in force on 1 January 2026
Method 3 – Equity + 4 × EBITDA (based on the last financial year closed before 1 January 2026)
Method 4 – Valuation established by an independent registered auditor or certified accountant
METHOD 1 - TRANSFER BETWEEN INDEPENDENT PARTIES IN 2025
The value is
determined on the basis of transfers between fully
independent parties, on the incorporation of companies, or on the basis of the
last capital increase that took place between 1 January and 31 December 2025.
Key points from the preparatory works:
- 2026 transfers
excluded: a transfer
occurring in 2026, even if valued on the basis of the value as of 31 December
2025, cannot serve as a reference (confirmation by the Minister of Finance, DOC
56 1244 /007 , p.16). - Multiple capital increases: if there were multiple capital increases in 2025, only the last capital increase that took place in 2025 may be used (clarification introduced by an amendment to the legal text); capital increases before or after 2025 are excluded.
METHOD 2 - CONTRACTUAL VALUATION FORMULA
The value results from the application of a valuation formula established in a contract or in a contractual offer of a put option, in force on 1 January 2026.
The preparatory works cite the example of stock option plans that provide for a valuation formula in the context of buy-back programs.
Key points from the preparatory works:
- Any contract or offer in force on 1 January 2026 is covered, without requiring that the sale be effective on that date.
- Non-binding offer letter: such a letter may be used, but only if it can be characterized as a contract or a contractual offer on the basis of its wording. This is a factual question to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis (DOC
56 1244/ 007, p.16).
METHOD 3 - EBITDA FORMULA
The formula
is as follows: Equity + (EBITDA × 4). It applies exclusively to the valuation of shares,
units and similar financial instruments.
3.1 Calculation basis and non-calendar Financial Year
- The EBITDA and equity are those of the last financial year closed before 1 January 2026.
- For companies with a non-calendar financial year (e.g. closing on 30 June), the accounts closed on 30 June 2025 apply; subsequent results cannot be taken into account directly.
3.2 Clarifications by the Minister of Finance (DOC 56 1244/ 007, p.16)
- To take into account results achieved since the last admissible closing date (i.e. results for the period between 1 July and 31 December 2025 in the above scenario), the only option will be to resort to a valuation under Method 4 (by a registered auditor or certified accountant).
- It is therefore clear that the EBITDA formula will not permit a lower result (or even losses) realized since the last admissible closing date to be reflected in the valuation of unlisted companies.
- Foreign
accounting standards may be used to calculate the
EBITDA.
3.3 Limited scope of this formula
The EBITDA
formula is exclusively intended for the historical valuation as
of 31 December 2025. It cannot be relied upon as a reference in other contexts,
such as valuations for personal income tax, corporate income tax, gift and
inheritance taxes (DOC
3.4 Economic Limitation: The Case of Holding Companies
The EBITDA
formula may produce an economically meaningless result in the case of a holding
company, since the financial data of the underlying subsidiaries are not taken
into account. The Minister of Finance did not address this criticism during the
preparatory works (DOC
METHOD 4 - VALUATION REPORT BY AN INDEPENDANT VALUATION EXPERT
This method may be used to:
- replace the EBITDA method if the taxpayer so chooses; or
- value a financial asset for which the three preceding methods are inapplicable or irrelevant.
4.1 Who may prepare the report?
Only an
independent registered auditor (other than the statutory
auditor) or a certified accountant. This choice is based on the fact
that these professions are regulated by law and subject to a disciplinary
regime (DOC
4.2 Deadline for Preparation
The valuation report must be prepared no later than 31 December 2027 (an extension compared with the initial preliminary draft, which set the deadline at the end of 2026).
4.3 Practical Questions (DOC 56 1244/ 007)
Questions
Answer from the Minister of Finance
What happens if different shareholders obtain divergent
valuations?
The tax authorities will not choose
between multiple valuation reports (p.14).
Obligation for the valuation expert to retain the
report and communicate it to the tax authorities?
No specific provision in the Act; the standard
retention periods apply (p.14).
Risk of liability for the valuation
expert?
A technical, non-tax question; the Minister cannot
answer it (p.15).
In which cases may the tax authorities challenge the
valuation?
Only in wholly exceptional situations, in
particular where there are indications that the valuation does not reflect
market value (p.38 and explanatory memorandum, p.52).
APPLICATION IN TIME OF THE FOUR METHODS
For subsequent valuations, for example where taxpayers take up residence in Belgium, or leave Belgium, after 1 January 2026, the rules are fundamentally different:
- The framework of the four methods described above does not apply.
- The acquisition value when a taxpayer immigrates may be established by any means of proof (with the exception of the oath), as confirmed by the Minister of Finance (DOC 56
1244/ 007, pp.44–45). - The immigrating or emigrating taxpayer therefore has considerably greater flexibility than the taxpayer who must value their financial assets as of 31 December 2025 under the ordinary framework.
For valuations as of 31 December 2025, taxpayers holding unlisted financial assets will need to decide quickly whether to engage a registered auditor (or certified accountant) to obtain a report by 31 December 2027. If they fail to obtain a report within the allotted time, they will in many cases only be able to rely on the EBITDA method alone, with the imperfections inherent to that valuation method.
-
This document is of a general nature, for information purposes, and does not constitute custom made personal advice. Although carefully drafted, it should not be relied upon as legal advice and as such does not engage any liability of the law firm Advisius.
© Advisius (CBE 0741.762.760)